Quote
“The electrical phenomena outside the sphere are identical with those arising from an imaginary series of singular points all at the center of the sphere.”
— James Clerk Maxwell (1891)
Motivation
Sub-atomic particles, atoms, molecules, and cells produce potentials that are often sampled far from the source — nuclei from electrons, molecules from detectors, cells from electrodes. This motivates us to develop machinery to systematically approximate the Coulomb integral:
Localization means is confined to a volume of linear dimension , and the observation point satisfies . The ratio is weighted by multipole moments encoding the geometry of the source.
The Primitive Cartesian Multipole Expansion
For confined to a sphere of radius and , Taylor-expand the Green function about the origin:
Substituting into the Coulomb integral:
where the primitive Cartesian multipole moments are:
| Moment | Definition | Point charges |
|---|---|---|
| Monopole | ||
| Dipole | ||
| Quadrupole |
Convergence and Dominance
Since and , each successive term is smaller by a factor . The asymptotic behavior is governed by the first non-vanishing term. For , the object looks like a point charge at large distances.
The Complete Primitive Expansion
The full series can be written compactly as:
where the th-order primitive moment is
and
This works because the Taylor expansion of is exactly a power series in with coefficients built from derivatives of .
Electric Dipole
The Dipole Potential and Field
The second term in the expansion dominates for most electrically neutral () objects — neutrons, atoms, molecules, plasmas, ordinary matter:
The same structure governs the far field of a magnetic dipole — see Chapter 10 — with the replacement .
When Is Well-Defined?
The dipole moment depends on the choice of origin when : shifting the origin by gives . For a neutral system (), is origin-independent.
A system has a permanent dipole moment when in its ground state (e.g., water). An induced dipole moment arises from an external field (conductors, dielectrics).
The electric field follows from . Choosing and using :
Field Lines and Circular Orbits
The field line equation integrates to .
The dependence and angle-dependence of the dipole field lead to non-central forces and non-trivial dynamics. To see this, decompose into cylindrical components (with the dipole along , using and ):
A circular orbit around the dipole axis (in a plane perpendicular to ) requires the force to be purely centripetal — pointing only toward the axis, with no component that would push the particle up or down out of the orbital plane. This means we need , which occurs at:
At this cone of angles, the field points purely in the direction. For the right sign of charge (so the radial force is inward), this provides exactly the centripetal force needed for circular motion. An entire family of such orbits exists at different radii — all at the same polar angle .
However, these orbits are only marginally stable: the total energy for all of them (see Problem 4.5), so any perturbation causes the particle to drift to a different radius. Despite this marginal character, the quantum-mechanical version of this problem does yield true bound states when the dipole moment exceeds a critical value — rationalizing the experimental fact that neutral polar molecules can capture electrons to form stable negative ions.
Example — Average Field Inside a Sphere
Let be the electric field produced by a charge density , and let be a sphere of radius centered at the origin. Then:
where is the dipole moment of the charge inside and is the field at the center due to charge outside .
Proof: Start from:
Reverse the order of integration and extract a minus sign:
The quantity in brackets is the electric field at produced by a uniformly charged sphere of density filling (since is constant with respect to the -integration). By Gauss’s law:
Substituting back and splitting the -integration into inside and outside :
The second integral is (the field at the origin from exterior charges, with an extra minus sign from the one we extracted). Collecting signs:
Two important special cases:
Condition Result Name All charge inside () Dipole moment from field average No charge inside () Mean value theorem for harmonic functions The second case states that in a charge-free region, the field at any point equals its average over any surrounding charge-free sphere — a direct consequence of (each Cartesian component of is itself harmonic). This is intimately connected to Earnshaw’s theorem and the result of Problem 4.21.
The Point Dipole
Maxwell’s construction: place at the ends of a vector and let with fixed. The resulting potential is exact at every point except :
The associated singular charge density follows from Poisson’s equation and :
Deriving by the Limiting Process
Start from . Taylor-expand the first delta function: all terms beyond first order vanish as , leaving .
Verification: Insert into the Coulomb integral and integrate by parts. The gradient acts on ; changing (since the function depends on ), we recover the exact point dipole potential.
The Complete Point Dipole Field (Including the Delta Function)
The field from the formula alone integrates to zero over any origin-centered sphere (by the angular symmetry of Figure 4.3). But Example 4.1 demands . Consistency requires a contact term:
where .
One can verify this directly: the delta function contributes to the volume integral, matching the required result.
Dipole Force, Torque, and Energy
Consider a neutral distribution in an external field . For a point dipole, the Taylor expansion of about is exact (the source is truly at a point, so all higher terms vanish in Maxwell’s limit). For a spatially extended distribution, we require to vary slowly over its extent.
Dipole Force
Expanding to first order about and using :
For constant (permanent dipole), using :
Note: This form is not valid for induced moments where varies in space.
An electric field gradient is needed to generate a force on a dipole.
Dipole Torque
Using the same approach with in :
The first term rotates toward ; the second rotates the center of mass about the origin.
Dipole Potential Energy
Checks: ✓. For torque: a rigid rotation gives , confirming ✓.
Dipole Interaction Energy
For point dipoles:
Electric Dipole Layers
A dipole layer is a charge-neutral macroscopic surface endowed with a dipole moment per unit area:
Physical Occurrence
Dipole layers arise wherever mobile charges accumulate near surfaces or boundary layers. The canonical example is the surface of a metal, where electron wavefunctions spill out beyond the last layer of positive ions, creating a thin layer of separated charge.
The treatment is fully general: need not be flat, and need not be perpendicular to the surface. The potential is a superposition of infinitesimal contributions :
Converting to a volume integral via a delta function (for a layer at ) and integrating by parts reveals the equivalent volume charge density:
where the effective surface charge density arises from in-plane variation of the layer:
Origin of
The negative end of each in-plane dipole cancels the positive end of its neighbor — unless there is a variation in magnitude or direction along the surface. The resulting incomplete cancellation is the source of .
Potential Discontinuity at a Dipole Layer
Key Matching Condition
The perpendicular component produces a jump in the potential across the layer:
Proof: Integrate once to get , then integrate from to .
The parallel components produce a discontinuity in the tangential electric field:
Under certain conditions, this generates corrections to the Fresnel formulae.
Application — Monolayer Electric Dipole Drops
Rectangular drops of polar molecules (width , length ) on a surface. Each row of dipoles (pointing out of the surface) is modeled as carrying dipole moment per unit length .
Chemical perimeter energy: .
Electrostatic energy: Sum pairwise row–row interactions. For two rows separated by , . Summing over all rows:
Minimizing at fixed area :
The width is independent of and depends exponentially on material parameters — characteristic of 2D dipole systems. Adding more molecules creates new drops of width rather than widening existing ones.
Electric Quadrupole
The quadrupole term dominates when . This applies to all atomic nuclei (parity invariance forces ) and all homonuclear diatomic molecules (like N, where inversion symmetry forbids both and ).
Why Do Molecules Have Dipole Moments Despite Parity?
In the body-fixed frame, the Hamiltonian is NOT parity-invariant (e.g., the two H atoms sit on one side of the O atom in water). The electron wavefunction does not have definite parity in this frame, so . In the lab frame, rotational averaging over all orientations would restore parity — but at finite temperature, the thermal ensemble retains a net in an external field.
Primitive Quadrupole Tensor
This is origin-independent when (by the same shift argument as for ). Despite the Cartesian indices, the integral need not be evaluated in Cartesian coordinates.
Symmetry and Principal Axes
(symmetric), so only 6 of 9 components are independent. One can always diagonalize by rotating to the principal axis system : where is unitary (built from eigenvectors of , which exist since is real symmetric). In principal axes, only 3 numbers are needed — analogous to the moment of inertia tensor.
Maxwell's Construction of the Quadrupole and Intuition
Place dipole at and at ; take :
This gives and .
Intuition: The simplest quadrupole to visualize is two anti-aligned dipoles: in a line. measures how stretched/squeezed the charge is along axis ; off-diagonal measures tilting/twisting.
Traceless Quadrupole Tensor
Using the identity , the quadrupole potential can be rewritten using the symmetric, traceless tensor:
The quadrupole potential simplifies to:
Why Traceless?
The constraint reduces the independent components from 6 to 5 — matching the number of spherical harmonics . In Maxwell’s construction, this corresponds to the freedom to choose , reducing 6 parameters (two 3-vectors) to 5 (two unit vectors plus one shared magnitude, minus one).
Quadrupole Force, Torque, and Energy
Example 4.2 — Traceless Quadrupole of a Uniform Ellipsoid
For an ellipsoid with volume , uniform charge density , and semi-axes :
Trick: Scale variables , , to convert the ellipsoid integral to a sphere integral. By the symmetry of the sphere, off-diagonal components vanish, and:
Spherical Multipole Expansion
The Cartesian expansion is poorly suited to spherical symmetry. Instead, use the binomial expansion of the Green function for :
This is recognized as the generating function for Legendre polynomials:
Key properties of :
| Property | Formula |
|---|---|
| Orthogonality | |
| Completeness | |
| First few |
Example — Force Between Non-Overlapping Spherical Distributions
Two non-overlapping spherical charge distributions (centered at origin) and (centered at ), with exterior to . By Gauss’s law, produces a point-charge potential outside itself.
Expanding with and using orthogonality: only survives, giving . The force is Coulomb’s law — as if each distribution were a point charge at its center.
Spherical Harmonic Expansion
To separate the angular dependence of and , apply the addition theorem:
This yields the full angular expansion:
where , .
Key spherical harmonic properties:
| Property | Formula |
|---|---|
| Orthonormality | |
| Completeness | |
| Conjugation | |
| First few |
Exterior and Interior Multipole Moments
Substituting into the Coulomb integral:
Exterior ():
Interior ():
Relationship to Cartesian Moments
The information in , is identical to that in ; the five carry the same information as . Each is a linear combination of the traceless Cartesian components and vice versa.
Azimuthal Symmetry
When (no -dependence), only survives:
Matching at a Spherical Surface
These are linear combinations of elementary solutions of Laplace’s equation. The coefficients and are chosen so the interior and exterior potentials satisfy the matching conditions at .
Application — The Potential Produced by
A spherical shell of radius with surface charge density .
Using and orthogonality, only survives:
Interior: constant field . Exterior: exact dipole field. Both expressions agree at (continuity of through a charge layer).
Application — Liquid Drop Model of Nuclear Fission
Bohr and Wheeler (1939): a uniform-charge sphere undergoes a small shape distortion as a precursor to fission.
Claim A: The most general azimuthally symmetric quadrupole distortion preserving volume and center of mass:
Proof of Claim A . The term is a rigid translation (since on the unit sphere, so gives a shifted sphere). Volume preservation via and Legendre orthogonality forces to second order.
Start with
Claim B: The change in Coulomb energy is:
Proof of Claim B (expanding the step function ) and .
Write
is the standard uniform-sphere potential. acts as an effective surface charge, producing via interior/exterior Legendre expansions matched at .
Green’s reciprocity eliminates cross-terms: , etc. The three surviving energy integrals evaluate (using Legendre orthogonality) to:
Summing and using gives .
Physical upshot: Surface tension opposes fission (); Coulomb energy favors it (). Fission occurs when the nucleus is charged enough that the Coulomb term wins.
Traceless Cartesian vs. Spherical: Counting Components
The primitive Cartesian moment is symmetric in its indices. The number of independent components is equal to the number in which the indices can values, regardless of order:
(equivalent to by a bars and stars argument as we are choosing which of three possibilities will each of indices correspond to, i.e., placing indistinguishable objects into three distinguishable boxes).
TODO: The book argument seems wrong in saying that vanishing traces are independent.
The traceless tensor equivalent vanishing trace conditions etc., which give the same constrain for any choice of indices, and taking any one of them, we get vanishing symmetric tensor of rank , which results in constraints so:
Thus, beginning with the quadrupole term, the traceless moments represent the potential with increasing efficiency.
Irreducibility
The spherical expansion has moments per order. The traceless Cartesian expansion also has components per order. Both representations are irreducible (maximally efficient). The primitive Cartesian representation is reducible — it carries redundant information for .
Maxwell’s generalization: the point -pole potential is
This has independent parameters: 2 angles per vector (due to fixed magnitude) plus 1 shared magnitude.
The Polarization from Multipole Expansion
A collection of point charges has . Taylor-expanding each delta function about a common origin:
where . This supports the general decomposition used in Section 2.4.1 and developed further in Ch. 6.
Problems
Foundations
4.2 — Smoluchowski’s Model of a Metal Surface
A semi-infinite metal ( as macroscopic surface) with positive charge density and negative charge density .
Solution Sketch
(a) models the sharp termination of positive ions at . models electron wavefunctions spilling into vacuum beyond the last ion layer, with decay length .
(b) The net charge density is . The dipole moment per unit area:
(c) By Gauss’s law () and using :
(d) : the potential change across the double layer, spread over the full system rather than as a sudden jump.
(e) Total energy per unit area: .
4.3 — Charge Density of a Point Dipole
The charge density of a point electric dipole with moment at is . (a) Derive this using a limiting process applied to two point charges separated by as . (b) Confirm by inserting into the Coulomb integral and recovering the dipole potential.
Solution Sketch
(a) From , Taylor-expand to first order; terms vanish as :
(b) Insert into the Coulomb integral, integrate by parts:
Change (since depends on the difference), recovering the exact dipole potential.
4.4 — No Self-Force (Stress Tensor Proof)
Use the electric stress tensor formalism to prove that no isolated charge distribution can exert a net force on itself. Distinguish the cases when has a net charge and when it does not.
Solution Sketch
Let enclose entirely. The net force is . Expand to infinity (permissible since no other charges exist). If has net charge, so . If is neutral, falls off even faster. Either way, .
4.5 — Point Charge Motion in a Dipole Field
Place a point electric dipole at the origin and release a point charge (initially at rest) from the point in the - plane. Show that the particle moves periodically in a semicircular arc.
Solution Sketch
Only is conserved (torque vanishes only on -axis). The problem specifies (charge starts at rest in the - plane).
With and , the equation of motion in gives:
For : motion requires , so — a semicircular arc with turning points at the equatorial crossings.
Why exactly circular? Energy conservation and the centripetal condition are identical, so is automatically maintained.
The total energy on this orbit, making it marginally unstable — any energy nudge causes drift to a different radius. For , circular orbits exist at (), but with independent of radius, these are also unstable.
4.6 — Work to Assemble a Point Dipole
Show that is the work increment required to assemble a point electric dipole with moment at , beginning with charge dispersed at infinity.
Solution Sketch
The work to bring to and to :
With (in the limit , , product finite):
Source: A.M. Portis, Electromagnetic Fields (Wiley, 1978).
4.7 — Dipoles at Vertices of Platonic Solids
Identical point electric dipoles are placed at the vertices of each of the five regular polyhedra. All dipoles are parallel (but the common direction is arbitrary). Show that the electric field at the center of each polyhedron is zero.
Solution Sketch
All five Platonic solids have cubic or icosahedral point group symmetry. The only vector invariant under all rotations of such a group is . Since the dipole field at the center is a vector that must be invariant under all symmetry operations of the polyhedron (which permute identical dipoles), it must vanish.
Alternatively (constructive): For the tetrahedron, verify by direct computation. The cube is the union of two interlocking tetrahedra, so . The octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron follow from their symmetry groups containing the tetrahedral group.
4.9 — Potential of a Double Layer
(a) Show that the potential due to a double-layer surface with dipole density is , where is the solid angle element subtended by as seen from . (b) Use this to derive the matching condition at a double-layer surface.
Solution Sketch
(a) Starting from , recognize :
(b) For uniform : approaching from one side, the surface subtends solid angle; from the other, . The jump is:
Multipole Moments and Symmetry
4.12 — Two Neutral Disks
Two identical, charge-neutral, origin-centered disks with radially symmetric charge density. One lies in the - plane; the other is tipped away from the first by angle about the -axis. Find such that the asymptotic potential in the - plane has the form where .
Solution Sketch
for each disk. because the charge density is radially symmetric (any integral vanishes by azimuthal averaging). The first nonzero contribution is quadrupole.
The dependence in the - plane is the quadrupole signature. For to be independent of angle in the - plane (i.e., with no angular modulation), the combined quadrupole must be isotropic in that plane.
Let be the polar angle for the horizontal disk and for the tipped disk. The total quadrupole potential goes as . This is angle-independent when , which requires . Hence .
Intuition: Two perpendicular quadrupoles cancel each other’s angular variation, just as two perpendicular dipoles would create a circularly symmetric field pattern.
Source: J.A. Greenwood, British Journal of Applied Physics 17, 1621 (1966).
4.13 — Interaction Energy of Adsorbed Molecules
Molecules adsorbed on a crystal surface at low temperature occupy the centers of an checkerboard. The orientation of each molecule is set by the lowest-order electrostatic interaction with its neighbors. (a) CO has a small dipole moment . For the arrangement parameterized by angle (all dipoles in-plane, tilted by from one lattice direction), find that minimizes the total energy considering each dipole’s 8 nearest neighbors, and show the energy/dipole is
(b) N has a small quadrupole moment (from electron buildup in the bond region). Sketch the expected orientational order.
Solution Sketch
(a) Evaluating the dipole–dipole interaction for 4 nearest neighbors (distance ) and 4 next-nearest (distance ):
Total energy per dipole (with for double counting):
The energy is independent of — the angle drops out entirely. This is analogous to how a ferromagnet’s exchange energy depends on spin alignment but not on the global magnetization direction.
(b) For N (quadrupole: charge pattern), maximizing nearest-neighbor Coulomb attraction suggests a herringbone pattern with alternating molecular orientations at to each other.
Source: V.M. Rozenbaum and V.M. Ogenko, Soviet Physics Solid State 26, 877 (1984).
4.15 — Quadrupole Moments: Cartesian Evaluation Only
Show explicitly that the primitive quadrupole moment is defined using Cartesian components , and that the integrals must be evaluated in Cartesian coordinates even if the final result is desired in another coordinate system.
Solution Sketch
The definition uses Cartesian components , so the integrals must be evaluated in Cartesian coordinates (where , etc.). To express results in spherical coordinates, simply substitute their spherical representations in , after computing the integrals in Cartesian form.
4.16 — Properties of a Point Electric Quadrupole
The singular charge density of a point quadrupole at is . (a) Verify this produces the correct quadrupole potential via the Coulomb integral. (b) Find the force on in an external field . (c) Find the torque . (d) Find the interaction energy .
Solution Sketch
(a) Insert into the Coulomb integral and integrate by parts twice. Each passes through the delta function onto , recovering the quadrupole potential.
(b)
(c) . Expanding the derivatives and using
Q_{mj} = Q_{jm}$: $\mathbf{N} = 2(\mathsf{Q}\cdot\nabla)\times\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{F}(d) .
4.17 — Interaction Energy of Nitrogen Molecules
How does the leading contribution to the electrostatic interaction energy between two N molecules depend on the distance between them?
Solution Sketch
Each N is a quadrupole (, ): , , .
. The interaction energy falls off as .
Alternatively: The potential of molecule A is . The charge density of B is . The interaction involves 4 derivatives on , giving .
4.18 — A Black Box of Charge
A charge distribution inside a black box has all exterior multipole moments for equal to zero (in coordinates centered on the box). This does not imply spherical symmetry. Prove by constructing a counterexample.
Solution Sketch
Counterexample: Place a point charge at the center (gives only ). Surround it by a concentric spherical shell of total charge uniformly distributed — this “point-plus-shell” (PPS) object produces zero field outside itself. Now place any number of PPS objects at arbitrary positions inside the box. The resulting charge distribution is non-spherically symmetric, yet all exterior multipole moments for vanish.
Alternative: Two concentric shells with and radii , with amplitudes chosen so . Each shell only produces ; canceling these gives a non-spherically symmetric distribution with all exterior moments vanishing — yet the internal charge arrangement is manifestly not spherically symmetric.
4.20 — Practice with Spherical Multipoles
A spherical shell of radius carries surface charge density . (a) Evaluate the exterior spherical multipole moments. (b) Write in the form . (c)–(d) Repeat for interior moments and potential. (e) Check the matching conditions at . (f) Extract the dipole moment .
Solution Sketch
Key step: Rewrite the charge density in terms of spherical harmonics. Since , and :
Only , contribute.
(a) Exterior moments: .
(b) Exterior potential: .
(c)–(d) Interior moments: same procedure with instead of , giving .
(e) Both agree at (continuity ✓). The normal derivative jump gives ✓.
(f) The exterior potential identifies .
4.21 — Mean Value Theorem via Interior Multipole Expansion
Let be a charge-free volume of space. Use an interior spherical multipole expansion to show that the average of over the surface of any spherical sub-volume inside equals the potential at the center of that sub-volume.
Solution Sketch
Choose the origin at the center of a charge-free spherical sub-volume of radius . All source charge is outside, so an interior expansion applies:
Average over the sphere’s surface using and orthonormality:
Only , survives. But , so : the average over any charge-free sphere equals the value at its center.
4.23 — Exterior Multipoles for Specified Potential on a Sphere
(a) Let be specified on a sphere of radius . Show that the exterior potential is
(b) The eight octants of a spherical shell are held at alternating potentials . Find the asymptotic form of the exterior potential.
Solution Sketch
(a) The general exterior expansion is . At :
Orthonormality gives , so:
(b) Eight octants at alternating . By inspection of the symmetries:
- Potential flips sign under →
- Potential flips sign under → must be odd
- Minimum with :
Check: flips sign under both and ✓.
The asymptotic potential is:
Key insight: Exact numerical coefficients are tedious, but the symmetry analysis alone determines which harmonics appear. The leading term falls off as .
4.25 — Analyze This Potential
An asymptotic potential has the form . (a) Use the traceless Cartesian expansion to show no localized source can produce this. (b) Repeat using the primitive Cartesian expansion. (c) Show that a suitable can be found if we drop the requirement that the source is localized.
Solution Sketch
(a) Traceless Cartesian: The quadrupole term is . Having only requires with and all off-diagonals zero. But the traceless condition then forces — contradiction. No localized source exists.
(b) Primitive Cartesian: The quadrupole term is . Setting off-diagonals to zero and demanding only appear:
Requiring the and coefficients to vanish gives two equations whose only solution is , which then makes the coefficient zero too. Same conclusion: impossible.
(c) If extends to infinity, we can always find a source via Poisson’s equation: . The localization requirement is what makes it impossible — the traceless constraint is a direct consequence of for , which underpins all multipole expansions of localized sources.